The Support You Need, When You Need It.
Call 1-888-326-9244 Today!

ACCIDENT SUMMARY - Asphyxiation

Accident Type: Asphyxiation Image - Fatal Facts No. 36
Weather Conditions: Warm, partly cloudy
Type of Operation: Sandblasting/painting contractor
Size of Work Crew: 4
Collective Bargaining No
Competent Safety Monitor on Site: Yes
Safety and Health Program in Effect: Limited
Was the Work site Inspected Regularly: Yes
Training and Education Provided: Inadequate
Employee Job Title: Sandblaster/Painter
Age & Sex: 56-Male
Experience at this Type of Work: 5 years on a permanently assigned crew
Time on Project: 45 minutes

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT

A contract employee was assigned to sandblast the inside of a reactor vessel during turnaround activities at a petrochemical refinery. Instead of relying on the contract company's own air compressors in accordance with the contractor's policy, the contract foreman connected the employee's supplied air respirator to a hose containing what he thought was plant air. Instead it was nitrogen. Both hoses were identical except for markings at the shutoff valve. The sandblaster entered the vessel, descended to the bottom, placed the respirator hood on his head and was overcome.

ACCIDENT PREVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Employers must instruct employees to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions associated with their work (29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2)).
  2. Contractors should follow a policy of using only their own air compressors or breathing air cylinders for their employees.
  3. Middle and/or upper management personnel should routinely check first line supervisors to insure they are following established company safety policies.

SOURCES OF HELP

NOTE: The case here described was selected as being representative of fatalities caused by improper work practices. No special emphasis or priority is implied nor is the case necessarily a recent occurrence. The legal aspects of the incident have been resolved, and the case is now closed.