Safe Workplace and Safety News
This is the safety news blog for the Safe Workplace web site. We cover workplace safety related news with a focus on how safety, or a lack of safety, impacts employers, employees and their families. We also cover topics such as safety training, safety tools, and legal issues related to safety. For regular safety news and information enter your email address in the box above the Subscribe button to the right (then click on the button).
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
OSHA Issues $1,000,000 In Penalties To RPI Coating Inc. And Xcel Energy
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has proposed $845,100 in penalties against RPI Coating Inc. of Santa Fe Springs, Calif., and $189,900 in proposed penalties against the Public Service Co. of Colorado, doing business as Xcel Energy, for alleged serious and willful violations of federal workplace safety and health standards following a tunnel fire last year that killed five employees.
"This catastrophe could have been avoided if the companies had followed their critical safety procedures," said Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Edwin G. Foulke Jr. "There should never be such a disregard for the safety of employees. Today's citations should serve as a reminder to all employers about the critical need to always provide a safe and healthful workplace for their employees."
The fire began at the Xcel Energy Cabin Creek hydroelectric plant in Georgetown, Colo., on Oct. 2, 2007, while employees were in a tunnel cleaning a sprayer with a flammable solvent. Vapor from the solvent ignited, causing the fire. Four employees escaped, but five employees working deeper inside the tunnel were unable to escape and died due to asphyxiation.
RPI has received 13 willful citations with proposed penalties totaling $778,500. These include three per-instance willful citations alleging that RPI brought electrical equipment into the tunnel that was not safe because it could ignite the solvent. RPI also has received 10 willful citations alleging the unsafe handling of flammable liquids, failure to provide employees with adequate ventilation, failure to install carbon monoxide alarms, failure to arrange for emergency response in the event of an accident, failure to train on worksite chemical hazards and a lack of fire extinguishers in the work area. It also has received 25 serious citations with penalties totaling $66,600 that include alleged fall hazards, the unsafe storage of flammable liquids outside the tunnel and improper respiratory protection.
Xcel Energy has been issued two willful citations with proposed penalties of $126,000 for failing to take precautions to protect its own employees from hazards in the tunnel and to arrange for rescue services. Xcel Energy also has received 19 serious citations with proposed penalties totaling $63,900, which include alleged fall hazards, the unsafe storage of compressed gas and electrical hazards.
The companies have 15 business days from the receipt of the citations to request an informal conference with OSHA's area director or to contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.
Labels: OSHA Citations
posted by Steve Hudgik |
Workplace Safety Post 3 Comments |
![]()

















3 Comments:
how many casualities before the court will send those bastard to jail.....
If these emploees were more carefull that accident would never had hapened.
OSHA always blaimes the employer
but the employees are the ones that do not want to follow the safety rules.
The employees are not to blame for their deaths. The employees of RPI Coating, Inc. were only as smart about job site safety as their employer taught them to be. The lack of any fire extinguishers inside the penstock where they were working along with not having a planned escape route in the event of an accident like the fire that started are both tell tale signs of lack of training about how serious and dangerous working in a confined space on any job site in the world is the fault of company management. At the very least the Foreman on that job site should have haad confined space training but he was one of the casulities which is apparant and very obvious that he was not qualified to be a Foreman on a job site involving working in a confined space. No disrespect to his soul or his surviving family members. He was only as smart as the training his company provided to him. I worked for that company many years as a Foreman and I am very proud of the fact that I never ever had a man injured or hurt in any way or and any deaths ever on any job that I ran as the Foreman for that company for as long as I worked for them.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home